\begin{table}[h!]
    \centering
    \caption{Robustness to Lot Area Threshold}
    \label{tab:lot_area_thresh}
    \begin{tabular*}{\textwidth}{@{\extracolsep{\fill}}lccc@{}}
\toprule
                     & \multicolumn{3}{c}{Lot Area Threshold} \\ \cmidrule{2-4}
                      & (1) & (2) & (3) \\
                     & 20\%                       & 10\%                       & 30\%                       \\  \midrule \addlinespace 
No Controls          &  6.506***                         &        6.681***                    &       6.525***                     \\
                     &  (0.986)                         &         (1.133)                    &           (0.965)                  \\ \addlinespace 
Lot Controls         &   5.525***                         &        5.864***                    &       5.455***                     \\
                     &  (1.009)                         &         (1.197)                    &           (0.989)                  \\ \addlinespace 
Block Controls       &     6.662***                         &        6.927***                    &       6.649***                     \\
                     &  (1.102)                         &         (1.307)                    &           (1.062)                  \\ \addlinespace 
Lot \& Block Controls &       6.136***                         &        6.577***                    &       6.091***                     \\
                     &  (1.100)                         &         (1.330)                    &           (1.081)                  \\ \addlinespace \bottomrule
\end{tabular*}
            \begin{spacing}{1}
\begin{tablenotes}
      \item \footnotesize \textit{Notes:} This table examines the robustness of the GMM logit coefficient estimates for the effect of the 421-a tax incentive. The specification estimated is always Equation \ref{eq:gmm}, changing the construction of the simulated instrument. Column 1 reports baseline estimates, in which we use the simulated instrument where comparable lots must be within 20 percent of the lot area as the actual lot. Column 2 tightens this comparison to lots within 10 percent of the actual lot area. Column 3 loosens the comparison to 30 percent. Each row presents a specification within a given set of controls. All specifications include fixed effects for the borough and year of initial permit issuance.  Standard errors are clustered at the neighborhood level. $\sym{*} = p < 0.10$, $\sym{**} = p < 0.05$, $\sym{***} = p < 0.01$.
      \end{tablenotes}
       \end{spacing}
\end{table}